DMD-2026-011
End-user device refresh
DeferredTechnology need
- Priority score
- 41
- Estimated cost
- SAR 12M
- Net present value
- −SAR 1.8M
- Internal rate of return
- -0.3%
- Payback period
- —
- Rank in the 2027 plan
- —
Score confirmed by the evaluation panel
No payback within the horizon
- Gate into «Submitted»DecisionGoDate22 March 2026DraftComplete
- Gate into «Initial review»DecisionGoDate10 April 2026SubmittedComplete
- Gate into «Feasibility»DecisionGoDate29 April 2026Initial reviewComplete
- Gate into «Evaluation»DecisionGoDate17 May 2026FeasibilityComplete
- Gate into «Committee review»DecisionGoDate5 June 2026EvaluationComplete
- Gate into «Approved»DecisionOn holdDate24 June 2026Committee reviewCurrent stageCurrent stage
- Gate into «Prioritized»DecisionNot held yet7ApprovedNot started
- Gate into «Converted to project»DecisionNot held yet8PrioritizedNot started
- 9Converted to projectNot started
P4P4 · Low priority — score 41 of 100
Priority class
Low priority
Computed from the score and the approved model’s thresholds; may be changed with a reason kept in the history
By the model: P4 (score 41)
Class thresholds
P175–100P260–74P345–59P40–44
The approved model (version 4) with the eleven criteria; the score is the weighted mean of the ratings scaled to 100.
Evaluation against the priority model
| Criterion | Weight | Rating (1–5) | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | |||
| Fit with the SCA strategyHow far the proposal moves the objectives, initiatives and KPIs of the SCA strategy, “Building the Future with Confidence”.Raises priority | 20% | 2.9 | 9.5 |
| Value added to the contracting sectorThe value it adds to the sector and the authority: clearer regulation, higher quality or a new capability.Raises priority | 12% | 2.6 | 4.8 |
| Financial return & sustainabilityThe return in the feasibility study, and its contribution to a sustainable financial base from service and programme fees.Raises priority | 8% | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Urgency & compliance | |||
| UrgencyThe cost of delay: what the authority and its member contractors lose if work does not start this year.Raises priority | 10% | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| Regulatory requirementIs it required by law, regulation, an SCA board decision or a supervising body’s directive (Ministry of Municipalities and Housing, NCA, the National Data Management Office)?Raises priority | 10% | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Impact | |||
| Impact on contractors & beneficiariesIts direct effect on member contractors, project owners and sector workers: time, effort and satisfaction.Raises priority | 14% | 2.2 | 4.2 |
| Sustainability impactIts contribution to energy and water efficiency in SCA buildings and centres, and lower emissions.Raises priority | 3% | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| Digital transformation impactIts contribution to digital contractor services, SCA processes and the use of sector data.Raises priority | 5% | 3.5 | 3.1 |
| Effort & risk | |||
| RiskDelivery, technical and contractual risk — the higher it is, the lower the priority.Lowers priority | 7% | 2.0 | 5.3 |
| ComplexityThe number of parties, branches, systems, integrations and procedure changes involved.Lowers priority | 6% | 2.3 | 4.1 |
| Resource requirementThe team, budget and scarce skills it draws from the portfolio’s capacity.Lowers priority | 5% | 1.9 | 3.9 |
| Priority scoreScore confirmed by the evaluation panel | 41 / 100 | ||
Evaluation profile
This request’s ratings against the average approved request
- This request
- Approved average
| Category | This request | Approved average |
|---|---|---|
| Alignment | 48 | 94 |
| Value | 40 | 91 |
| Return | 10 | 77 |
| Urgency | 22 | 79 |
| Regulatory | 30 | 27 |
| Risk | 75 | 89 |
| Complexity | 68 | 79 |
| Resources | 78 | 91 |
| Beneficiary | 30 | 63 |
| Sustainability | 20 | 30 |
| Digital | 63 | 58 |
Evaluation panel
The request goes to committee only when everyone has signed
Karim Haddad
Senior Digital Delivery Consultant — PMO
Technical evaluation complete
Signed 2026-06-05Haifa S. Al-Ruwaili
Senior Financial Analyst
Financial review complete
Signed 2026-06-05Eng. Asma S. Al-Hamdan
Enterprise Architect
Architecture review complete
Signed 2026-06-05