MunjazStrategy & projects
MunjazPMO PLATFORMProposal
Project proposal & feasibility study
Justification, objectives, benefits, cost and initial risks
- Form no.
- SCA-PMO-F01
- Template edition
- 2.1
- Version
- V1
- Form date
- 2026-05-27
- Hijri
- 10 Dhuʻl-Hijjah 1447 AH
Auto-filled — Filled by the platform from the project record, not typed.
- Proposal no.
- DMD-2026-015
- Proposal
- Digital twin of the headquarters and qualification centres
- Portfolio
- Headquarters & Regional Centres Portfolio
- Sector
- Corporate Support Sector
- Sponsor
- Eng. Bandar M. Al-Shammari
- Proposed by
- Eng. Ahmed Y. Asiri
1The proposalAuto-filled
- TitleAuto-filled
- Digital twin of the headquarters and qualification centres
- Proposed byAuto-filled
- Eng. Ahmed Y. Asiri
- DepartmentAuto-filled
- Construction Projects Department
- Submitted onAuto-filled
- 2026-05-27
- Proposal numberAuto-filled
- DMD-2026-015
2Justification
The problem or need
Maintenance of 46 SCA buildings and centres runs on a calendar, not on actual condition, so money goes where it is not needed and test halls fail without warning.
Today
There is no single digital model of the buildings, and as-built drawings and systems data sit in separate files per contractor.
3Objectives
- A digital twin of the headquarters and qualification centres that combines building information models, sensors and hall occupancy to predict faults and direct maintenance.
Strategic objectives served
- SO-3.1 — SCA services and programmes in every region
- SO-2.3 — Transparency and open sector information
4Expected benefits
| Kind | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Cost saving | Maintenance cost down 18% through condition-based work |
| Time saved | Faults caught six months before they show |
5Cost & feasibilityAuto-filled
Estimated cost
SAR 18.5M
Net present value
SAR 5.6M
Return on investment
38%
Payback
3.6 years
| Year | Capex | Opex | Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | SAR 9.5M | SAR 0 | SAR 0 |
| 2028 | SAR 9M | SAR 1.6M | SAR 3.2M |
| 2029 | SAR 0 | SAR 1.7M | SAR 7M |
| 2030 | SAR 0 | SAR 1.8M | SAR 8.6M |
| 2031 | SAR 0 | SAR 1.8M | SAR 9.2M |
| 2032 | SAR 0 | SAR 1.9M | SAR 9.6M |
6Initial risks
| Risk | Level | Proposed response |
|---|---|---|
| Delay integrating national systems | High | Start integration requests during feasibility |
| Quality of old as-built drawings | Medium | A fresh laser scan of the main complexes |
Approval logChain: Proposal & feasibility approval · version 4
Every decision on the form — who, their role, the note and the time. It prints with the form.
| # | Step | Kind | Name | Decision | Note | Date & time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Author | — | Eng. Ahmed Y. AsiriDirector, Construction Projects | Submitted | — | 2026-05-27 11:44 |
| 2 | Line manager endorsement | Technical acceptance | Eng. Reem K. Al-DosariThe requester’s line manager | Approved | — | 2026-05-31 13:28 |
| 3 | PMO review | Methodology review | Ghada A. Al-ShahraniPMO — analyst | Approved | — | 2026-06-03 14:35 |
| 4 | Portfolio manager review | Technical acceptance | Approval enginePortfolio manager | Pre-breach alert | — | 2026-09-28 08:00 |
| 5 | Portfolio manager review | Technical acceptance | Approval engineEscalated automatically to PMO — director (Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi) on 2026-09-30 | Automatic escalation | — | 2026-09-30 08:05 |
Signatures
Line manager endorsement
Eng. Reem K. Al-Dosari
Approved2026-05-31
PMO review
Ghada A. Al-Shahrani
Approved2026-06-03
Portfolio manager review
Eng. Bandar M. Al-Shammari
Awaiting decision
Cost & funding review
Munirah A. Al-Khalidi
Later
Project Approval Committee
Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi
Later