SO-4.2 · A mature operating model and accountability
Enterprise automation & government integration
The SCA ERP linked to Etimad, plus correspondence and HR self-service automation to cut running costs.
Initiative weighted progress
75.4%
Σ each project’s contribution × its actual progress, over the shares that count
Linked projects’ progress
75.4%
Σ contribution × progress, projects only
Contributions assigned
100%
Complete and approved
Primary projects’ budget
90.1M
3 primary projects
Linked projects and their contributions
Strategy management approves each share; every change is kept in the initiative’s history
| Project | Link | Contribution | Actual progress | Contribution × progress | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA ERP System PRJ-2026-001 | Primary | 60% | 61% | 36.6% | |
| Correspondence & Document Management System (DMS) PRJ-2026-017 | Primary | 25% | 95% | 23.8% | |
| HR Self-Service PRJ-2026-032 | Primary | 15% | 100% | 15.0% |
Linked projects’ progress
Σ (contribution × progress) = 75.4% points ÷ shares counted 100% = 75.4%
Initiative progress
The initiative runs wholly through its projects, so its progress is theirs: 75.4%
Impact KPIs & benefits
Measured apart from delivery progress: an initiative can be well advanced with no impact yet, and the other way round
Impact KPIs
The strategic KPIs the initiative moves
Actual 84Target 90%Attained 93%
Actual 83Target 95%Attained 87%
Benefits
Benefits registered for its projects, planned vs realised
- Staff hours saved by HR automation3,450 / 3,200 hours / month
- Paper and printing savings1.4 / 1.2 SAR M
- Faster routing of correspondence3.2 / 1.5 days
These KPIs and benefits do not enter the weighted progress above, and progress does not enter them.
Three separate measures
An example from this initiative: SCA ERP System
1Deliverable weight in the project
40.0%
Weight of «Build» among its deliverables
Deliverable weights add up to 100% inside the project; it progresses as they are accepted.
See where it comes from2Project weight in the portfolio
16.4%
Its relative weight in Technology & Enterprise Systems Portfolio
Set by the project weight model; it feeds portfolio progress: relative weight × actual progress.
See where it comes from3Contribution to the initiative
60%
Its contribution to «Enterprise automation & government integration»
Approved by strategy management; it feeds this initiative’s progress only.
Each is set in its own place and moves neither of the others: changing a deliverable’s weight touches neither the project’s portfolio weight nor its contribution.