SO-4.2 · A mature operating model and accountability
Performance measurement & governance
The institutional performance system and KPI dashboard, the SCA strategy refresh and execution plans, and the enterprise risk & continuity framework.
Initiative weighted progress
77.7%
Σ each project’s contribution × its actual progress, over the shares that count
Linked projects’ progress
77.7%
Σ contribution × progress, projects only
Contributions assigned
90%
10 points short of 100%
Primary projects’ budget
16.6M
3 primary projects
Linked projects and their contributions
Strategy management approves each share; every change is kept in the initiative’s history
| Project | Link | Contribution | Actual progress | Contribution × progress | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional Performance Measurement & KPI Dashboard PRJ-2026-012 | Primary | 40% | 76% | 30.4% | |
| SCA Strategy Refresh & Execution Plans PRJ-2026-028 | Primary | 35% | 70% | 24.5% | |
| Enterprise Risk & Business Continuity Framework PRJ-2026-030 | Primary | 15% | 100% | 15.0% |
Linked projects’ progress
Σ (contribution × progress) = 69.9% points ÷ shares counted 90% = 77.7%
Initiative progress
The initiative runs wholly through its projects, so its progress is theirs: 77.7%
Shares add up to 90%, not 100%.
Impact KPIs & benefits
Measured apart from delivery progress: an initiative can be well advanced with no impact yet, and the other way round
Impact KPIs
The strategic KPIs the initiative moves
Actual 84Target 90%Attained 93%
Actual 3.2Target 3.5out of 5Attained 91%
Benefits
Benefits registered for its projects, planned vs realised
These KPIs and benefits do not enter the weighted progress above, and progress does not enter them.
Three separate measures
An example from this initiative: Institutional Performance Measurement & KPI Dashboard
1Deliverable weight in the project
30.0%
Weight of «Design» among its deliverables
Deliverable weights add up to 100% inside the project; it progresses as they are accepted.
See where it comes from2Project weight in the portfolio
18.3%
Its relative weight in Institutional Excellence & Governance Portfolio
Set by the project weight model; it feeds portfolio progress: relative weight × actual progress.
See where it comes from3Contribution to the initiative
40%
Its contribution to «Performance measurement & governance»
Approved by strategy management; it feeds this initiative’s progress only.
Each is set in its own place and moves neither of the others: changing a deliverable’s weight touches neither the project’s portfolio weight nor its contribution.