AI insight
Every active project in the portfolio is on track
No project is off track or critical; the weakest health dimension is “Resources” at 72.
Confidence78%
Portfolio · PF-INS
Institutional Excellence & Governance Portfolio
On track
Strategy, performance measurement, risk management, the Irtiqaa portal and the Academy platform.
- Approved budget
- SAR 40M
- Actual spend
- SAR 17.6M
- EAC
- SAR 30.5M−23.8%
- Expected value
- SAR 85M
- Health score
- 84+2
incl. SAR 9.5M unallocated reserve
44% of budget
Estimate at completion
40% realised
was 82 in May
Manager
Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi
Director, Project Management Office
Owner
Sarah A. Al-Qarni
Head, Corporate Support Sector
Weighted portfolio progress
Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model
What each project adds to portfolio progress
The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds
| Project | Project weight | Relative weight | Actual progress | Weight × progress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA Strategy Refresh & Execution Plans | 65.0 | 23.8% | 70% | 16.7% |
| Irtiqaa Portal — Release 2 | 56.0 | 20.5% | 63% | 12.9% |
| SCA Academy — Learning Platform & Professional Tracks | 54.0 | 19.8% | 4% | 0.8% |
| Institutional Performance Measurement & KPI Dashboard | 50.0 | 18.3% | 76% | 13.9% |
| Enterprise Risk & Business Continuity Framework | 48.0 | 17.6% | 100% | 17.6% |
| Portfolio progress | 61.9% | |||
How it is computed
61.9%
Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.
- · Proposed and cancelled projects never count.
- · Left out of this portfolio now: 0
- · For comparison: weighting by budget alone gives 57.8%
Portfolio health & performance
The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.
Health-score breakdown
Score × weight = points
84On track
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | 86 | 20% | 17.2 |
| Cost | 94 | 20% | 18.8 |
| Risk | 82 | 15% | 12.3 |
| Scope | 80 | 10% | 8.0 |
| Quality | 84 | 10% | 8.4 |
| Resources | 72 | 10% | 7.2 |
| Stakeholders | 86 | 5% | 4.3 |
| Benefits | 78 | 10% | 7.8 |
| Total | 84 | ||
Health-score trend
May – October 2026
Financial & schedule performance
May – October 2026
0.98
On track
Schedule performance index
Progress 62% / Planned 63%
1.00
On track
Cost performance index
Actual spend SAR 17.6M
Both indices over time
- Schedule performance index
- Cost performance index
Portfolio project map
risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.
Portfolio project map
- On track
- At risk
Funding priority order
Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.
- 1SCA Strategy Refresh & Execution PlansPRJ-2026-028·Priority score 82On track
- 2Institutional Performance Measurement & KPI DashboardPRJ-2026-012·Priority score 70On track
- 3Enterprise Risk & Business Continuity FrameworkPRJ-2026-030·Priority score 63On track
- 4Irtiqaa Portal — Release 2PRJ-2026-027·Priority score 60At risk
- 5SCA Academy — Learning Platform & Professional TracksPRJ-2026-029·Priority score 55On track
Portfolio priorities 2026–2027
- Approve the SCA strategy’s execution plans before year endIt feeds the 2027 portfolio planning cycle.
- Raise PMO maturity to 3.53.2 today.
- Launch the SCA Academy learning platform and professional tracksFirst cohort in Q1 2027.
Objectives & KPIs
Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.
Objectives the portfolio serves
85% achieved of a 90% target3 projects contribute
82% achieved of a 85% target2 projects contribute
Budget & value
Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.
From approved budget to estimate at completion
Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Approved budget | SAR 40M | SAR 40M |
| Unallocated reserve | −SAR 9.5M | SAR 30.5M |
| Institutional Excellence & Capability Programme | +SAR 131K | SAR 30.6M |
| Projects outside a programme | −SAR 138K | SAR 30.5M |
| Estimate at completion | SAR 30.5M | SAR 30.5M |
Budget use
17.6M/ 40M9.5Mprojected saving(23.8%)
- Actual spend
- 17.6M
- Committed
- 21.5M
- Approved budget
- 40M
- Estimate at completion
- 30.5M
Expected-value mix
SAR 85M
Expected value
- ProductivitySAR 44.2M52%
- Cost savingSAR 23.8M28%
- Beneficiary satisfactionSAR 17M20%
| Category | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Productivity | SAR 44.2M | 52% |
| Cost saving | SAR 23.8M | 28% |
| Beneficiary satisfaction | SAR 17M | 20% |
| Total | SAR 85M | 100% |
40%
Value realised
SAR 33.6M
Expected value SAR 85M
108% of what was planned by today
Programmes & projects
A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.
5 results
Display options
| Institutional Performance Measurement & KPI DashboardPRJ-2026-012 | PG-10 | 4Execution | On track | 76% | 18.3% | P2P2 · High priority — score 70 of 100 | 9.8M | 9.8M0.0% | 1.01Schedule performance index · 1.01 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Excellent |
| SCA Academy — Learning Platform & Professional TracksPRJ-2026-029 | PG-10 | 3Planning | On track | 4% | 19.8% | P3P3 · Medium priority — score 55 of 100 | 7.5M | 7.5M0.0% | 1.00Schedule performance index · 1.00 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Excellent |
| Irtiqaa Portal — Release 2PRJ-2026-027 | PG-10 | 4Execution | At risk | 63% | 20.5% | P2P2 · High priority — score 60 of 100 | 6.4M | 6.5M+2.0% | 0.88Schedule performance index · 0.88 | 0.98Cost performance index · 0.98 | Risk score · Good |
| Enterprise Risk & Business Continuity FrameworkPRJ-2026-030 | — | 5Closure | On track | 100% | 17.6% | P2P2 · High priority — score 63 of 100 | 3.6M | 3.5M−3.8% | 1.00Schedule performance index · 1.00 | 1.04Cost performance index · 1.04 | Risk score · Excellent |
| SCA Strategy Refresh & Execution PlansPRJ-2026-028 | PG-10 | 4Execution | On track | 70% | 23.8% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 82 of 100 | 3.2M | 3.2M0.0% | 1.03Schedule performance index · 1.03 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Excellent |
| Total · 5 | 30.5M | 30.5M |
1–5 of 5
Portfolio risks
Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.
Open-risk heat map
1 risk
- Critical0
- High0
- Medium1
- Low0
- Risks 1
Probability
5
4
3
2
1
12345Impact
| Probability \ Impact | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · High | 0 · Critical | 0 · Critical |
| 4 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · Medium | 0 · High | 0 · Critical |
| 3 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 1 · Medium | 0 · Medium | 0 · High |
| 2 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · Medium |
| 1 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low |
Latest on this portfolio
20 October 2026
Approval: Executive Committee Noted DEC-2026-039First draft of the SCA strategy refresh noted
2026-10-20 10:00