Saudi Contractors AuthorityMunjaz11My actionsNotifications

Portfolio · PF-DT

Digital Services & Platforms Portfolio

At risk

Muqawil and its app, Wifaq, the model contracts, the information centre, project tracking and the Future Projects Forum.

What-if scenarios
Approved budget
SAR 190M

incl. SAR 9.7M unallocated reserve

Actual spend
SAR 98.6M

⁦52%⁩ of budget

EAC
SAR 183.9M−3.2%

Estimate at completion

Expected value
SAR 640M

⁦14%⁩ realised

Health score
74−5

was ⁦79⁩ in May

Manager

Faisal A. Al-Shehri

Director General, Digital Platforms & Digital Services Portfolio Manager

Owner

Eng. Majed S. Al-Rasheed

Head, Digital Transformation Sector

AI insight

⁦2⁩ projects in this portfolio are pulling its health down

Most of it comes from “Muqawil Platform — Release ⁦4⁩” (SPI ⁦0.87⁩) and “Contracting Sector Information Centre & Data Governance” (SPI ⁦0.89⁩). Fixing those two lifts the portfolio towards ⁦83⁩ within two quarters.

Confidence⁦81%⁩

Weighted portfolio progress

Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model

What each project adds to portfolio progress

The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds

ProjectProject weightRelative weightActual progressWeight × progress
Muqawil Platform — Release 488.0⁦21.8%⁩⁦58%⁩⁦12.6%⁩
Contracting Sector Information Centre & Data Governance70.0⁦17.3%⁩⁦62%⁩⁦10.7%⁩
Project Tracking Platform — National Phase66.0⁦16.3%⁩⁦1%⁩⁦0.2%⁩
Wifaq Dispute Settlement Platform — Release 263.0⁦15.6%⁩⁦91%⁩⁦14.2%⁩
Muqawil Mobile App — Release 363.0⁦15.6%⁩⁦64%⁩⁦10.0%⁩
Electronic Model Contracts54.0⁦13.4%⁩⁦100%⁩⁦13.4%⁩
Future Projects Forum 2027Left out — proposed54.0—⁦0%⁩—
Portfolio progress⁦61.1%⁩

How it is computed

⁦61.1%⁩

Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.

  • · Proposed and cancelled projects never count.
  • · Left out of this portfolio now: ⁦1⁩
  • · For comparison: weighting by budget alone gives ⁦53.6%⁩

Suspended projects

Open the project weight model

Portfolio health & performance

The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.

Health-score breakdown

Score × weight = points

74At risk
DimensionScoreWeightPoints
Schedule68⁦20%⁩13.6
Cost84⁦20%⁩16.8
Risk62⁦15%⁩9.3
Scope80⁦10%⁩8.0
Quality82⁦10%⁩8.2
Resources66⁦10%⁩6.6
Stakeholders78⁦5%⁩3.9
Benefits76⁦10%⁩7.6
Total74

Health-score trend

May – October 2026

7974

Financial & schedule performance

May – October 2026

Both indices over time

  • Schedule performance index
  • Cost performance index

Portfolio project map

risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.

Portfolio project map

  • On track
  • At risk
Approved budget · SAR 86.4M

Funding priority order

Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.

  1. 1Muqawil Platform — Release 4PRJ-2026-014·Priority score 91At risk
  2. 2Wifaq Dispute Settlement Platform — Release 2PRJ-2026-008·Priority score 80On track
  3. 3Muqawil Mobile App — Release 3PRJ-2026-015·Priority score 78On track
  4. 4Project Tracking Platform — National PhasePRJ-2026-023·Priority score 76On track
  5. 5Contracting Sector Information Centre & Data GovernancePRJ-2026-016·Priority score 72At risk
  6. 6Future Projects Forum 2027PRJ-2026-035·Priority score 52On track

Portfolio priorities 2026–2027

  • Launch Muqawil Release 4 by Q2 2027The portfolio’s critical path — the mobile app and the Wifaq membership-file link depend on it.
  • Lift SCA services fully available online to 80%Tied directly to the contractor digital-satisfaction KPI that is behind target.
  • Publish sector indicators and project tracking on governed dataConditional on the case and party data catalogue being complete.

Objectives & KPIs

Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.

Budget & value

Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.

From approved budget to estimate at completion

Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast

From approved budget to estimate at completion
  • Total
  • Increase
  • Decrease
From approved budget to estimate at completion
CategoryChangeRunning total
Approved budgetSAR 190MSAR 190M
Unallocated reserve−SAR 9.7MSAR 180.3M
Muqawil & e-Services Programme+SAR 2.5MSAR 182.8M
Sector Information & Project Tracking Programme+SAR 1.1MSAR 183.9M
Projects outside a programmeSAR 0SAR 183.9M
Estimate at completionSAR 183.9MSAR 183.9M

Budget use

98.6M/ 190M6.1Mprojected saving(⁦3.2%⁩)
Actual spend
98.6M
Committed
124.6M
Approved budget
190M
Estimate at completion
183.9M

Expected-value mix

Expected-value mix

SAR 640M

Expected value

  • Time savedSAR 217.6M⁦34%⁩
  • Beneficiary satisfactionSAR 166.4M⁦26%⁩
  • Cost savingSAR 140.8M⁦22%⁩
  • RevenueSAR 115.2M⁦18%⁩
Expected-value mix
CategoryValueShare
Time savedSAR 217.6M⁦34%⁩
Beneficiary satisfactionSAR 166.4M⁦26%⁩
Cost savingSAR 140.8M⁦22%⁩
RevenueSAR 115.2M⁦18%⁩
TotalSAR 640M⁦100%⁩

SAR 92.4M

Expected value SAR 640M

⁦78%⁩ of what was planned by today

Programmes & projects

A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.

⁦7⁩ results
Export CSV
Muqawil Platform — Release 4PRJ-2026-014PG-014ExecutionAt risk⁦58%⁩⁦21.8%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦91⁩ of 10086.4M90M⁦+4.2%⁩0.87Schedule performance index · 0.870.96Cost performance index · 0.96Risk score · Weak
Project Tracking Platform — National PhasePRJ-2026-023PG-022InitiationOn track⁦1%⁩⁦16.3%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦76⁩ of 10028M28M⁦0.0%⁩1.00Schedule performance index · 1.001.00Cost performance index · 1.00Risk score · Good
Contracting Sector Information Centre & Data GovernancePRJ-2026-016PG-024ExecutionAt risk⁦62%⁩⁦17.3%⁩P2P2 · High priority — score ⁦72⁩ of 10021.5M22.6M⁦+5.3%⁩0.89Schedule performance index · 0.890.95Cost performance index · 0.95Risk score · Fair
Wifaq Dispute Settlement Platform — Release 2PRJ-2026-008PG-014ExecutionOn track⁦91%⁩⁦15.6%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦80⁩ of 10018.4M18M⁦−2.0%⁩1.01Schedule performance index · 1.011.02Cost performance index · 1.02Risk score · Good
Muqawil Mobile App — Release 3PRJ-2026-015PG-014ExecutionOn track⁦64%⁩⁦15.6%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦78⁩ of 10012.6M12.1M⁦−3.8%⁩1.02Schedule performance index · 1.021.04Cost performance index · 1.04Risk score · Good
Electronic Model ContractsPRJ-2026-031PG-015ClosureOn track⁦100%⁩⁦13.4%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦75⁩ of 1008.2M8M⁦−2.9%⁩1.00Schedule performance index · 1.001.03Cost performance index · 1.03Risk score · Excellent
Future Projects Forum 2027PRJ-2026-035—1Pre-startOn track⁦0%⁩—P3P3 · Medium priority — score ⁦52⁩ of 1005.2M5.2M⁦0.0%⁩1.00Schedule performance index · 1.001.00Cost performance index · 1.00Risk score · Good
Total · 7180.3M183.9M
⁦1⁩–⁦7⁩ of ⁦7⁩

Portfolio risks

Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.

Open-risk heat map

11 risks

Open-risk heat map
  • Critical0
  • High2
  • Medium7
  • Low2
  • Risks 11
Probability
5
4
3
2
1
12345

Impact

Open-risk heat map
Probability \ Impact12345
50 · Low0 · Medium0 · High0 · Critical0 · Critical
40 · Low0 · Medium0 · Medium2 · High0 · Critical
30 · Low0 · Low4 · Medium2 · Medium0 · High
20 · Low0 · Low2 · Low1 · Medium0 · Medium
10 · Low0 · Low0 · Low0 · Low0 · Low

Latest on this portfolio

26 October 2026

  1. Gate decision: Projects Steering Committee Conditional Go DEC-2026-042Project Tracking Platform cleared to planning, with conditions

    2026-10-26 10:00

15 September 2026

  1. Gate decision: Projects Steering Committee Conditional Go DEC-2026-031Corrective plan for Muqawil Release 4 approved

    2026-09-15 10:00
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close